• Home
  • Services
  • IP Value Blog
  • FAQ
  • About Us
  • Contact

VLF Consulting, Inc.

  • Fed Circuit Upholds Rejection of $70 million Verdict Against Cisco in XpertUniverse

    January 21, 2015
    • Tweet

    As a follow up to our 2013 post regarding a Daubert ruling in this case, the Federal Circuit this week upheld the district court’s rejection of a $70 million jury verdict, finding that the lower court correctly found a lack of evidence that Cisco defrauded XpertUniverse during a partnership between the firms. As we noted previously, the $70 million claim related to lost business value that Plaintiff’s expert computed.

    The district court had also ruled that Plaintiffs failed to show that Cisco’s concealing their news of denial from XpertUniverse destroyed Plaintiff’s partnership opportunities that led to the lost business value. In short, Plaintiffs failed to prove causation, which the judge had warned them about in the March 2013 Daubert ruling that permitted presentation of the $70 million in claimed damages.

    XpertUniverse Inc. v. Cisco Systems Inc., 09-157-RGA (D. DE, November 20, 2013, Order) (Andrews)

    Leave a Reply

    Click here to cancel reply.
  • SEARCH

    What we do

    IP Value Blog focuses on news and current court cases regarding intellectual property valuation. IP Value Blog is published by Eric Phillips of VLF Consulting.

    Subscribe via Email

    TAGS

    25% Rule, Apportionment Techniques, Data Considered, Date of Hypothetical Negotiation, Daubert, Entire Market Value Rule, Forward Citation Analysis, Hypothetical Negotiation, Jury Verdict Form, License Agreement Comparability, Lost Profits, Lump Sum, Method Claims, Nash Equilibrium, Non-Infringing Alternatives, Patent Reform Act, Post-Judgment Royalty, Prejudgment Interest, Royalty Base, Royalty Rate, Surveys, Use of Settlement Agreements
  • LinkedIn
© VLF Consulting, Inc. 2025
  • Privacy Policy