• Home
  • Services
  • IP Value Blog
  • FAQ
  • About Us
  • Contact

VLF Consulting, Inc.

  • Posts Tagged ‘Lump Sum’

    Newer »
    November 18, 2011 Entire Market Value Rule, License Agreement Comparability, Lump Sum, Nash Equilibrium

    On Remand, Lucent v. Microsoft Judge Slashes Jury’s Damages

    Following the jury’s $70 million lump-sum royalty damages verdict from July, the district court judge slashes Lucent’s award to $26 million, finding several shortcomings in Lucent’s damages position that the jury had accepted.  This case deals with Lucent’s Day patent, called the “date picker” patent …LEARN MORE

    August 3, 2011 Entire Market Value Rule, License Agreement Comparability, Lump Sum

    Backgrounder: Lucent Technologies v. Gateway et al.

    In this patent infringement case, Lucent sought reasonable royalties of $562 million for Microsoft’s use of a patent covering a date-picker feature of Outlook, based on an 8% royalty applied to Outlook sales.  Microsoft countered that $6.5 million would be a reasonable royalty, and the jury awarded $358 million …LEARN MORE

    Newer »

  • SEARCH

    What we do

    IP Value Blog focuses on news and current court cases regarding intellectual property valuation. IP Value Blog is published by Eric Phillips of VLF Consulting.

    Subscribe via Email

    TAGS

    25% Rule, Apportionment Techniques, Data Considered, Date of Hypothetical Negotiation, Daubert, Entire Market Value Rule, Forward Citation Analysis, Hypothetical Negotiation, Jury Verdict Form, License Agreement Comparability, Lost Profits, Lump Sum, Method Claims, Nash Equilibrium, Non-Infringing Alternatives, Patent Reform Act, Post-Judgment Royalty, Prejudgment Interest, Royalty Base, Royalty Rate, Surveys, Use of Settlement Agreements
  • LinkedIn
© VLF Consulting, Inc. 2025
  • Privacy Policy